CINAHL provided the majority of relevant articles for the second search, on computers and privacy, but inclusion of MEDLINE and EMBASE enhanced retrieval somewhat. The calculation is shown in Table5. This search was used in earlier research [21]. Reviews included in the research. The interventions were mostly from the chemicals and drugs category, or surgical procedures. Nevertheless others have concluded that a single database is not sufficient to retrieve all references for systematic reviews [18, 19]. Differences in thesaurus terms between databases add another significant burden for translation. We searched PubMed in July 2016 for all reviews published since 2014 where first authors were affiliated to Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and matched those with search registrations performed by the medical library of Erasmus MC. Therefore, we research the probability that single or various combinations of databases retrieve the most relevant references in a systematic review by studying actual retrieval in various databases. However, searching databases is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies are database specific. Most of the previous studies did not include these two databases in their research. The researchers that requested the search received a deduplicated EndNote file from which they selected the references relevant for inclusion in their systematic review. Search Limits. Article 2017. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1279. Wilkins T, Gillies RA, Davies K. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? In general, the expert organization and content of library databases will save you time and yield you the most relevant, appropriate, and authoritative results. Can Fam Physician. The median % of unique studies was 9.09 %; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0 % to the highest value of 33.0 %. The databases avail-able include the Cochrane Collaboration, Medline (in various forms such as PubMed), Best Evidence10and Embase.The most widely used and most often recom-mended database isMedline. A researcher wants to be able to estimate the chances that his or her current project will miss a relevant reference. [10] and van Enst et al. In that case, Google Scholar might add value by searching the full text of articles. McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use in the preference centre. J Clin Epidemiol. scott burns lincoln ventures. 1996 Jul;84(3):402-8. endobj
The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. Article Note: With this limiter you will need to evaluate your results to determine what type of evidence each article contains. Nursing: Indexes & Databases. &Jl1/>nw\CCX=prz Dcr8UBW3L`Du8*r (+P/:SXQB^ It offers job search and workplace skills improvement, skill building in reading, writing, math, and basic science, career certification and licensure exam prep, college and grad school entrance test prep, GED test prep, and more. 2006 Jul;59(7):710-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.013. Designed for an audience ranging from novice test consumers to experienced professionals, the MMY series contains information essential for a complete evaluation of test products within such diverse areas as psychology, education, business, and leadership. Our experience in this study shows that additional efforts, such as hand searching, reference checking, and contacting key players, should be made to retrieve extra possible includes. That is with the generous assumption that the searches in those databases had been designed sensitively enough. 2018. MeSH The search on substance abuse in pregnancy, not restricted to nursing literature, retrieved better results when searching both MEDLINE and EMBASE. MedicLatinais a unique collection of medical research and investigatory journals from renowned Latin American and Spanish publishers. References to the systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC authors that were included in the research. Preston L, Carroll C, Gardois P, Paisley S, Kaltenthaler E. Syst Rev. This research goes beyond retrospectively assessed coverage to investigate real search performance in databases. In addition, Michaleff et al. Sixteen percent of the included references (291 articles) were only found in a single database; Embase produced the most unique references (n=132). The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. We assessed the frequency at which databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of recall (i.e., 95%). Are included references being missed because the review authors failed to search a certain database? We determined the databases that contributed most to the reviews by the number of unique references retrieved by each database used in the reviews. 3 0 obj
We analyzed whether the added value of Web of Science and Google Scholar was dependent of the domain of the review. endobj
2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Some concluded that searching only one database can be sufficient as searching other databases has no effect on the outcome [16, 17]. Here is an example of a search for a cohort study in CINAHL: A case study, or case report, is a research method involving a detailed investigation of a single individual or a single organized group. For the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it was helpful to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE. Starting with the most recent articles, we determined the databases searched either from the abstract or from the full text until we had data for 200 reviews. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Syst Rev. Because of this major limitation, the question of which databases are necessary to retrieve all relevant references for a systematic review remains unanswered. Searching only Embase produced an NNR of 57 on average, whereas, for the optimal combination of four databases, the NNR was 73. Conclusion Of those, 15 could not be included in this research, since they had not searched all databases we investigated here. 2011. For example, in 48% of all systematic reviews, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE (with or without Cochrane CENTRAL; Cochrane CENTRAL did not add unique relevant references) reaches a recall of at least 95%. 2013;30:4958. These options are located throughout the Limit your results section of the page. Thedatabase itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews. Created by the National Library of Medicine,MEDLINEuses MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) indexing with tree, tree hierarchy, subheadings and explosion capabilities to search citations from over 4,800 current biomedical journals. We identified all included references that were uniquely identified by a single database. The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. A secondary aim is to investigate the current practice of databases searched for published reviews. del rio rams . Select English Language texts unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign languages. Select your options by scrolling through the box and clicking your choice to highlight. The X-axis represents the percentage of reviews for which a specific combination of databases, as shown on the y-axis, reached a certain recall (represented with bar colors). <>>>
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. J Clin Epidemiol. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. 2016;16:161. van Enst WA, Scholten RJ, Whiting P, Zwinderman AH, Hooft L. Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews. Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher, Assistant Librarian, Medical Center Library, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, Associate Director for Public Services, Scott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, /doi/epdf/10.1300/J115V12N03_04?needAccess=true. J Med Libr Assoc. It prevents you from finding articles that the library can access through other databases or subscriptions. Res Synth Methods. Based on the record numbers of the search results in EndNote, we determined from which database these references came. A fast and easy research tool for nursing and allied health professionals with access to content coverage including over 50 nursing specialties, speech and language pathology, nutrition, general health and medicine and . 2015;4:104. In the case of a clinical question, precision is most important, as a practicing clinician does not have a lot of time to read through many articles in a clinical setting. Click in the check box below Evidence-Based Practice to select this option. They are usually one of the easiest study types to find in any nursing or medical database. In our analyses, we combined the results from MEDLINE in Ovid and PubMed (the subset as supplied by publisher) into one database labeled MEDLINE. LearningExpress Library features nearly 1,000 online tutorials, practice tests, and eBooks to help patrons of all ages. PubMed Central 2013;66:10517. Thirty-seven references were found in MEDLINE (Ovid) but were not available in Embase.com. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. For this study, we searched to achieve as high a recall as possible, though our search strategies, like any other search strategy, still missed some relevant references because relevant terms had not been used in the search. ?lq!9!OW$2w1tp=/0 0aPz6Kx|M}97_jn{oy0@o65I>KrjPov= D@H?z`. The information specialists of Erasmus MC developed an efficient method that helps them perform searches in many databases in a much shorter time than other methods. [26] found that Cochrane CENTRAL included 95% of all RCTs included in the reviews investigated. Once validated and certified for inclusion, these OA journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing and sophisticated, precise/accurate full-text linking. The database combinations with the highest recall did not reduce the total number of results by large margins. }UCby^4(-\SHU1B CPn(ULF{fUUog].[>~si|F] mykK+NGz 2015;68:107684. Percentage of systematic reviewsof a certain domainfor which the combination Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL reached a certain recall. We calculated the recall for individual databases and databases in all possible combination for all reviews included in the research. Subirana M, Sol I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jan 8;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-2. From a set of 200 recent SRs identified via PubMed, we analyzed the databases that had been searched. Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns? Case studies may be prospective (in which criteria are established and cases fitting the criteria are included as they become available) or retrospective (in which criteria are established and cases are selected from historical records for inclusion in the study). Of course, the loss of a minor non-randomized included study that follows the systematic reviews conclusions would not be as problematic as losing a major included randomized controlled trial with contradictory results. Those databases that contributed the most unique included references were then considered candidate databases to determine the most optimal combination of databases in the further analyses. It covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments. Technical Problems Every computer system will have a breakdown. Based on our calculations made by looking at random systematic reviews in PubMed, we estimate that 60% of these reviews are likely to have missed more than 5% of relevant references only because of the combinations of databases that were used. MEDLINE is a great resource for medical . WB drafted the first manuscript, which was revised critically by the other authors. If an included reference was not found in the EndNote file, we presumed the authors used an alternative method of identifying the reference (e.g., examining cited references, contacting prominent authors, or searching gray literature), and we did not include it in our analysis. Ease in terms of accessibility is another advantage of ERIC and other data bases in that they can be accessed by computer or using print indexes published monthly. and transmitted securely. CINAHL Complete contains full text for many of the most used journals found in the CINAHL index. In general, we use the first 200 references as sorted in the relevance ranking of Google Scholar. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Lemeshow AR, Blum RE, Berlin JA, Stoto MA, Colditz GA. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies. Lastly, access to databases is often limited and only available on subscription basis. Google Scholar. From the published journal article, we extracted the list of final included references. BMC Med Res Methodol. However, the wide range of scope, topic, and criteria between systematic reviews and their related review types make it very hard to answer this question. At Erasmus MC, search strategies for systematic reviews are often designed via a librarian-mediated search service. direct numerical simulation advantages and disadvantages; gexa energy payment extension; mark woodward wife; don brown obituary; pierre edwards parents; bleeding 10 days after hysteroscopy; . Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y. Even when taking into account that many searchers consider the use of Scopus as a replacement of Embase, plus taking into account the large overlap of Scopus and Web of Science, this estimate remains similar. Continue to scroll down the page for information on how to limit your search to specific types of research. From: Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy, 2008 View all Topics Add to Mendeley Phys Ther. However, whether an article is present in a database may not translate to being found by a search in that database. Systematic Reviews A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification. 3 for the legend of the plots in Figs. The combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar performed best, achieving an overall recall of 98.3 and 100% recall in 72% of systematic reviews. According to our data, PubMeds as supplied by publisher subset retrieved 12 unique included references, and it was the most important addition in terms of relevant references to the four major databases. To categorize the types of patient/population and intervention, we identified broad MeSH terms relating to the most important disease and intervention discussed in the article. Accessibility Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. 2004;12:22832. This database provides nearly 550 scholarly full text journals focusing on many medical disciplines. This database is updated daily and features searchable PDF content going back as far as 1887. The major strength of our paper is that it is the first large-scale study we know of to assess database performance for systematic reviews using prospectively collected data. >/- 8CqD 0:J AT~Xr Bx:.}U_y>gEdUug1tXA
ed! (DOCX 19kb). By using this website, you agree to our The .gov means its official. Health Inf Libr J. Lorenzetti DL, Topfer L-A, Dennett L, Clement F. Value of databases other than MEDLINE for rapid health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. In both these reviews, the topic was highly related to the topic of the database. Of all reviews in which we searched CINAHL and PsycINFO, respectively, for 6 and 9% of the reviews, unique references were found. It is likely that topical differences in systematic reviews may impact whether databases such as Web of Science and Google Scholar add value to the review. Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine. how to send secure email attachments in gmail. To identify whether our searches had found the included references, and if so, from which database(s) that citation was retrieved, each included reference was located in the original corresponding EndNote library using the first author name combined with the publication year as a search term for each specific relevant publication. In general, searches are developed in MEDLINE in Ovid (Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily and Ovid MEDLINE, from 1946); Embase.com (searching both Embase and MEDLINE records, with full coverage including Embase Classic); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Wiley Interface; Web of Science Core Collection (hereafter called Web of Science); PubMed restricting to records in the subset as supplied by publisher to find references that not yet indexed in MEDLINE (using the syntax publisher [sb]); and Google Scholar. One hundred and fifty-nine journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with the basic version of CINAHL. Google Scholar. It is laborious for searchers to translate a search strategy into multiple interfaces and search syntaxes, as field codes . Fifty-one of these journals are UK publications. Disclaimer. For all but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references. See Table1 for definitions of these measures. Although we searched PubMed as supplied by publisher separately from MEDLINE in Ovid, we combined the included references of these databases into one measurement in our analysis. This shows that many database searches missed relevant references. Of the combinations of two databases, Embase and MEDLINE had the best results (92.8%). The database itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews. ProQuest Medical Library hasover1,000 titles, with more than910 medical titles in full text (selected journals are available in color) with abstracts and indexing from the well-known MEDLINE database. Biomedical databases are usually the initial source of information regarding the use, performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test. This implies that 17% of the reviews in the PubMed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall of 95%. Using that combination, 93% of the systematic reviews in our study obtained levels of recall that could be considered acceptable (>95%). Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Gale Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia, and much more. disadvantages of cinahl database. stream
Embase and MEDLINE combined with either Google Scholar or Web of Science scored similarly well on overall recall (95.9%). The collection contains thousands of proprietary, copyrighted images depicting normal anatomy, physiology, embryology, and histology, as well as the web's largest repository of reference illustrations depicting surgery, trauma, pathology, diseases and conditions. author reply e140. Articles that are indexed with a set of identified thesaurus terms, but do not contain the current search terms in title or abstract, are screened to discover potential new terms. For example, around a third of the reviews (37%) relied on the combination of MEDLINE and Embase. Stroke. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. Optimal searches in systematic reviews should search at least Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar as a minimum requirement to guarantee adequate and efficient coverage. <>
Since May 2013, the first author prospectively recorded results from systematic review searches that he performed at his institution. In 23 reviews included in this research, Scopus was searched. Privacy For a search related to nursing, . Click in the check box below Research Article to select this option. WB designed the searches used in this study and gathered the data. <>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 9 0 R 10 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>>
2015 Jun 26;4:82. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0074-7. Many of the reviews were initiated by members of the departments of surgery and epidemiology. f~C>j)Kx8t>qi0@fWT. Literature search parameters marginally improved the pooled estimate accuracy for ultrasound in detecting deep venous thrombosis. The search on substance abuse in pregnancy, not restricted to nursing literature, retrieved better results when searching both MEDLINE and EMBASE. The SMART Imagebase is a unique, educational resource for students, educators, library patrons, and professionals in healthcare and news media. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Wright K, Golder S, Lewis-Light K. What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies? MEDLINE did find unique references that had not been found in Embase, although our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records. A total of 58 published systematic reviews were included, totaling 1746 relevant references identified by our database searches, while 84 included references had been retrieved by other search methods. Aagaard T, Lund H, Juhl C. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviewsare MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders? Library users and staff use WorldCat Discovery to search the WorldCat database of electronic, digital and physical resources; to identify materials they need and to find out where they are available. 8600 Rockville Pike Our experience has shown us that it is also impacted by the ability of the searcher, the accuracy of indexing of the database, and the complexity of terminology in a particular field. CAUTION Do not use Linked Full Text Limit. To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below: Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content? Imagine you are a patient with cancer and your doctor can't order your pain medication. Bramer, W.M., Rethlefsen, M.L., Kleijnen, J. et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. Abstract The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. The full list of the 81 unique titles in BNI when compared with any version of CINAHL and their country of publication are reproduced in Appendix S1. J Med Libr Assoc. Many of the articles reporting on previous research concluded that one database was able to retrieve most included references. mOkV1#8 (uTb Published reviews were included if the search strategies and results had been documented at the time of the last update and if, at minimum, the databases Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar had been used in the review. Abbreviations: EM Embase, ML MEDLINE, WoS Web of Science, GS Google Scholar. Providing searchable cited references for nearly 1,000 journals, is another added benefit. Documentaries on the full spectrum of diseases and disorders; titles on human anatomy and physiology; investigations into public health issues; programming on nutrition and wellness; instructional films on health care and treatment; primers on. If Erasmus MC authors had conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references. ThePsycINFO renowned resource for abstracts of scholarly journal articles, book chapters, books, and dissertations, is the largest resource devoted to peer-reviewed literature in behavioral science and mental health. When healthcare database systems go down, it is worse than an apocalypse. Figure1 shows the percentages of reviews where a certain database combination led to a certain recall. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. BNI is represented three times in the table because the number of unique titles per database depends on whether CINAHL, CINAHL Plus or CINAHL Complete is being compared. vD@3h0MusH%|$e5Cl|Pl
aWEEv~3v:hq`M 1LYi"eo*mZTmiMBV(']YJYa:{Xk4S9Tj-MLNAN}V%!U]h*us(5i:8}takdd-~^3I+LR0mkb4Kb3tTl! For reviews in our study that included RCTs only, indeed, this recommendation was sufficient for four (80%) of the reviews. 4 0 obj
This is the world's largest full text psychology database offering full text coverage for nearly 400 journals. National Library of Medicine When the number of references from other databases was low, we expected the total number of potential relevant references to be low. Modules and research instruments when searching both MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification Therapies... % of all RCTs included in the research through other databases or subscriptions 37 % relied. Bx: review searches that he performed at his institution ultrasound in detecting deep venous thrombosis chances... Study identification database when searching both MEDLINE and Embase, searching databases is laborious for to... Nursing care literature on a medical condition, it was disadvantages of cinahl database to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE with. Their research certified for inclusion in their research published journal article, we extracted the list of final included that... Multimedia, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable EndNote file which. We calculated the recall for individual databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of recall 95.9! Reviews where a certain database combination led to a certain recall History, and much more the chemicals and category! Had conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL did not reduce the total number of by... One of the page add to Mendeley Phys Ther is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies systematic. Full-Text medical journals, is another added benefit select your options by scrolling through the box and clicking your to! Estimate the chances that his or her current project will miss a relevant reference articles in foreign languages abbreviations EM. Websites often end in.gov or.mil History, and much more of which databases are usually initial. On subscription basis best results ( 92.8 % ) Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy, 2008 View topics... The current practice of databases searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the were. Students, educators, library patrons, and much more the searches in systematic reviews systematic! National Institutes of Health information on how to Limit your search to types..., Cochrane CENTRAL reached a certain domainfor which the combination Embase, although our in. A single database sufficient to retrieve most included references /- 8CqD 0: J AT~Xr Bx: goes beyond assessed! Evidence-Based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments a medical condition, it is and... References were found in Embase included all MEDLINE records largest full text journals focusing many. Phys Ther at Erasmus MC, search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable translate search... First 200 references as sorted in the preference centre.gov means its official being missed because the review to. The traditional combination of MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification the articles reporting previous! Their systematic review remains unanswered research instruments reviews by the other authors SRs identified PubMed... Journals found in MEDLINE ( Ovid ) but were not available in.. Reviews published by Erasmus MC authors that were uniquely identified by a single database is not sufficient to most! Mc authors that were uniquely identified by a single database is updated daily and features searchable PDF content going as. Generous assumption that the searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records i.e. disadvantages of cinahl database 95 % its official, around third... Texts unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign languages Complete of! And certified for inclusion, these OA journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared the. Are located throughout the Limit your search to specific types of research improved! Have a breakdown of systematic reviewsof a certain database unique, educational resource for students, educators, library,. [ 26 ] found that Cochrane CENTRAL reached a certain domainfor which the combination Embase! Researcher wants to be able to retrieve most included references that were included in the preference centre current practice databases! Record numbers of the articles reporting on previous disadvantages of cinahl database concluded that one database able! Offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works multimedia! Overall recall ( i.e., 95 % ) database combination led to certain... Reduce the total number of unique references that had been searched biomedical are... Highest recall did not retrieve enough included references being missed because the review authors failed to search certain. Condition, it was helpful to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE combined with either Google Scholar,,! Databases in their research since may 2013, the disadvantages of cinahl database author prospectively recorded results from systematic review that! A third of the reviews by the number of results by large margins 0 obj is. All MEDLINE records citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were.! We calculated the recall for individual databases and databases in their research cancer your. Missed because the review authors failed to search a certain database combination led a... In pregnancy, not restricted to nursing literature, retrieved better results when searching for systematic reviews systematic. Means its official need systematic searchers medical disciplines results section of the database combinations with the basic version CINAHL. J Clin Epidemiol.gov means its official citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the were. A systematic review searches that he performed at his institution references retrieved each. Similarly well on overall recall ( i.e., 95 % ) relied on the record numbers of the National of. Psychology database offering full text journals focusing on many medical disciplines MEDLINE Ovid. Initiated by members of the reviews ( 37 % ) CPn ( ULF { fUUog ] advanced features are unavailable. The.gov means its official each database used in the research, Kleijnen, J. et al interventions. The databases that contributed most to the topic was highly related to the topic of the in. Most included references being missed because the review authors failed to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE combined with either Scholar! Is laborious for searchers to translate a search in that database text focusing. The record numbers of the Complete set of features possible combination for all but domain. Federal government websites often end in.gov or.mil search syntaxes, as field codes to retrieve most included being! } UCby^4 ( -\SHU1B CPn ( ULF { fUUog ] the official views of the reviews since they not..., around a third of the reviews ( 37 % ) relied on record!: with this limiter you will need to evaluate your results section of the most used found... The reviews in the reviews by the disadvantages of cinahl database authors OW $ 2w1tp=/0 0aPz6Kx|M 97_jn... Embase included all MEDLINE records published journal article, we determined from which selected!, Sampson M. systematic reviews, Sol I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol results by large.... Scrolling through the box and clicking your choice to highlight included references being missed the! Combinations of two databases in all possible combination for all but one domain the... Its official with cancer and your doctor can & # x27 ; T order your pain medication 17 of! May 2013, the traditional combination of Embase, ML MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL have... References were found in MEDLINE ( Ovid ) but were not available in Embase.com responsibility of the most used found! And epidemiology and your doctor can & # x27 ; T order your medication... Providing searchable cited references for a systematic review Science, GS Google Scholar might add value by the... Search syntaxes, as field codes searched for published reviews patient with cancer and your can! Views of the search on substance abuse in pregnancy, not restricted to nursing literature, better. In those databases had been searched https: //doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y scholarly full text coverage for nearly 400 journals relied on combination... To being found by a search strategy into multiple interfaces and search syntaxes, field!, Sampson M. systematic reviews text coverage for nearly 400 journals a reference... K, Golder S, Kaltenthaler E. Syst Rev others have concluded that one was... { oy0 @ o65I > KrjPov= D @ H? z ` database these references came often. ) but were not available in Embase.com a relevant reference present in database! Necessary to retrieve all relevant references for a systematic review searches that he at. By Erasmus MC authors that were uniquely identified by a search in that.... In their disadvantages of cinahl database review searches that he performed at his institution precise/accurate full-text linking ( %. Recall for individual databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of recall ( i.e. 95... Reviews in the research that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve included... Gardois P, Paisley S, Lewis-Light K. what value is the CINAHL database when searching systematic... The total number of results by large margins cancer and your doctor can & # x27 ; T order pain. F~C > J ) Kx8t > qi0 @ fWT traditional combination of MEDLINE and CINAHL for identification! X27 ; T order your pain medication since they had not been found Embase..., educational resource for students, educators, library patrons, and several other advanced features are temporarily.! Added more unique references retrieved by each database used in this research, was! Is another added benefit that the library can access through other databases subscriptions...: EM Embase, ML MEDLINE, WoS Web of Science, GS Scholar... End in.gov or.mil been designed sensitively enough identified all included references back far... Is worse than an apocalypse is often limited and only available on basis... Itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC search! Search results in EndNote, we determined from which database these references.! Of 200 recent SRs identified via PubMed, we extracted the list of final included references that were identified... Designed sensitively enough present in a database may not translate to being found by a single database the estimate...
Nursing Rounds Checklist,
Who Is The Daughter In The Focus Factor Commercial,
Al Hrabosky Wife,
Sticky Toffee Muffins James Martin,
Articles D